KK-22-194-2011

Ril Construction Sdn Bhd

---

Sugumar Balakrishnan

Claim for commitment fee held by solicitor as stakeholder Whether claim res judicata? Whether doctrine of res judicata can apply to judgment in default?

24-07-2014

The claim is dismissed with costs of RM10,000.00.

BKI-24NCC(ARB)-1/5-2014

Nexus Bay Resort Karambunai Sdn Bhd

---

Andersen Jay Scott AND OTHERS

1) Arbitration agreement executed after coming into force of AA 2005 2) Arbitration agreement refers to AA 1952 3) Present arbitrator appointed by KLRCA under AA 2005 4) Whether arbitration proceedings should be governed by AA 1952?

23-07-2014

OS dismissed with costs of RM10,000.00.

BKI-41H-19/4-2014

Pendakwa Raya

---

Mohd Yusriez Bin Abdul Amat

1) Charge of self administration of drugs 2) Marking on bottle different from marking on the request form 3) Whether doubt as to the identify of the sample of

17-07-2014

Both appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.

BKI-22-90/5-2012

Tan Sri Harris Mohd Salleh

---

DR Chong Eng Leong

Defamation Whether defendant responsible for edited press statement? Whether publication defamatory? Whether repetition of the statement by another relevant? Whether justification, fair commence and qualified privilege? Whether Reynolds defences applies.

15-07-2014

The claim of the plaintiff is allowed with costs of RM 50,000.00

BKI-13NCvC-1/1-2014

DANIEL JOHN JAMBUN

---

THE MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, MALAYSIA

1. Judicial Review leave application. 2. Whether main prayer is academic? 3. Whether leave should be granted if main prayer academic?

10-07-2014

Encl. 29 & 31 is dismissed. The Judicial Review Leave Application is also dismissed. The applicants shall pay costs of RM1,500 to the respondent.

K22-351-2001

Wong Eng Hoong @ Wong Ing Hung (Suing as the Chairman of the School Boardof Tsu Yu Kindergarten)

---

Hsu Hui Yin AND OTHERS

1. Effect of no case to answer submission. 2. Whether Tadika Tzu Yu is a legal entity by virtue of being registered under s. 20 of Education Act? 3. Whether legal entity behind or natural persons behind Tadika Tzu Yu should have been sued?

08-07-2014

Counterclaim of the 1st defendant is dismissed accordingly with costs of RM5,000.

BKI-12BNCvC-2/9-2013

King Hong (M) Sdn Bhd

---

Sabah Wiremesh & Fencing Sdn Bhd

Goods sold and delivered counterclaim for defective goods Whether right of indemnity available against manufacture of tiles? Whether tiles defective or not laid properly? Whether main contractor or architect who complained should have been called? Whether interest rate of 1.5% per month excessive?

27-06-2014

Appeal of the defendant against the plaintiff dismissed (2/9). The defendant to pay costs of RM6,000 to the plaintiff. The appeal of the plaintiff against the Third Party dismissed (1/9). The plaintiff to pay costs of RM5,000 to the Third Party.

BKI-28NCC-10/4-2014

Tradelift Indopalm Industries Sdn Bhd

---

Waris Selesa Sdn Bhd

Petition to wind up Affidavit filed a day before hearing No application to extend time Whether fatal? Whether tender to settle on day of hearing can be rejected? Whether it is preference payment? Whether it offends section 223 CA

25-06-2014

Petition granted as per prayers a, b and c. Provisional liquidator is hereby appointed as liquidator and to continue their duties as per the order dated 9 May 2014 as in Enclosure 13.

BKI-22-148/7-2012

Sky Trading

---

JAVA TIMBER SDN. BHD.

Claim for specific performance and/or damages. Primary remedy abandoned. Whether plaintiff should have amended statement of claim? Whether purchase orders should have been issued during shipment period?

25-06-2014

claim is dismissed with costs of RM 20,000.

BKI-22-91/7-2013

Sora Hasil Laut Sdn Bhd

---

Lim Ah Cham (t/a Tan Cha Bau Contractor) AND OTHERS

Whether jetty built of TOL is part of land? Whether jetty transferable to third party? Whether holder of TOL had exclusive right to possess the jetty Whether above issues can be determined under Oder 14A application

16-06-2014

OIT of prayer 1-6 of the statement of claim. Damages to be assessed against the 1st to 3rd defendants jointly and severally from 16th May 2013. Pre-judgment interest of 5 % to run from the date of the writ to date of judgment and thereafter post judgment interest of 5% until full settlement. The 1st and 2nd Defendant to pay costs of RM10,000 to the plaintiff. The 3rd defendant to pay costs of RM10,000 to the plaintiff.